| |
|
Pig Flow |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
How many breeding females do I breed this
batch? |
|
|
- The aim of efficient pig farming is to
maximize the pounds output of pig meat from the farm to
provide safe, high quality and consistent pig meat for
consumption. In order to efficiently farm both the pig and
any health issues, all-in/all-out farming has to be
practiced. However, many pig farmers claim to do
'all-in/all-out', but when their operation is examined in
any detail they are found to only give all-in/all-out lip
service at best.
- A major reason for lack of
all-in/all-out in the grow/finish herd is variable weaner
input which causes stress on the farm. This is
particularly evident in farrow to finish family units.
- Examination of the breeding records
reveals the underlying cause of the problem- breeding
targets are not being met, or even has not been set.
|
|
Table 1
Sixteen weeks worth of breeding records with results
|
Week |
Number bred |
Number farrowed |
Number weaned |
|
1 |
16 |
14 |
139 |
|
2 |
12 |
10 |
100 |
|
3 |
9 |
7 |
69 |
|
4 |
10 |
9 |
93 |
|
5 |
11 |
9 |
91 |
|
6 |
8 |
6 |
59 |
|
7 |
15 |
13 |
130 |
|
8 |
12 |
10 |
101 |
|
9 |
14 |
12 |
118 |
|
10 |
9 |
7 |
69 |
|
11 |
16 |
14 |
140 |
|
12 |
12 |
10 |
102 |
|
13 |
9 |
8 |
82 |
|
14 |
8 |
6 |
60 |
|
15 |
9 |
7 |
69 |
|
16 |
10 |
6 |
80 |
|
Averages |
12 bred per week |
83% farrowing rate |
10 weaned/
sow |
|
|
- On many of these farms, when the
stockpeople are asked "how many breeding females did you breed
this week?"
- The answer is: "depends on how many were
in heat!"
- In itself this statement is true but shows
no concept of the farm's actual requirement.
- To manage pig health effectively it is
necessary to decide what the end points of production are and
then plan the farm backward to achieve this output target.
There are eight production questions to ask before an
effective pig flow model can be designed. To demonstrate the
concept an example farm will be utilized.
|
|
|
Example farm: |
The farm is a 250 sow with farrow to finish
accommodation. The finishing accommodation is intended for
pigs from 66lbs to slaughter at 250lbs liveweight. The farm
weans once a week on a Thursday. The last 16 weeks of
production is illustrated in table 1. How many sows should be
bred each week to optimize output?
|
|
8 questions are required to ask to
design a suitable pig flow model:
(Pig flow calculator) |
- What is the batch unit of time?
- The batch unit is the basic time interval
by which the all-in/all-out will be governed, for instance,
weaning occurs on this farm every Thursday, therefore this
produces a weekly (7 day) batch size.
- How much space is available in the
finishing unit?
- Measurement of the pens reveal there are
12764 sq feet of unobstructed floor space for the pigs.
Note: this does not include feeder space or the
passageways. The passageway is an area of intense debate on
many farms, as utilization may be necessary to comply with
current swine care stocking rate suggestions.
- What is the growth rate of pigs from 66lbs
to 250lbs?
- The farm generally has a good growth
rate. The average 66lbs pig is 10 weeks old and the average
250 lbs pig is 26 weeks old. Giving a difference of 16
weeks. If we allow one additional week for tail enders to
grow on and a day for cleaning, 17 weeks are required to
take each weekly batch of 66lbs pigs to 250lbs.
- What is the space requirement for a 250 lbs
pig?
- European Union Directive 91/630 EEC lays
down minimum standards for the protection of pigs, an
average pig greater than 85 kg (187 lbs) but less than or
equal to 110 kg (242 lbs) must be provided with 0.65 m2 (7
sq feet) of unobstructed floor space. There is no equivalent
legislation in the US. However, the Swine Care Guide (NPB
2001) suggests 8 sq feet for a finished pig. Therefore, when
12784 sq feet finishing space is divided into 17 weeks of
batches, this results in 752 sq feet per weekly batch.
Because the farm adopts strict all-in/all-out and each pig
requires 8 sq feet this provides sufficient space for 1598
grow/finish pigs (66 to 250lbs).
Table 2
Stocking rate regulations:
|
EU Legislation 91/630 |
Swine Care Manual (NPB 2001) |
|
Average Weight of pig
kg |
Minimum Space requirement m2 |
Weight of pig
lbs |
Suggested floor space sq feet |
|
≤ 10 kg |
0.15 |
12-30 |
1.7-2.5 |
|
≤ 20 kg |
0.20 |
30-60 |
3-4 |
|
≤ 30 kg |
0.30 |
60-100 |
5 |
|
≤ 50 kg |
0.40 |
100-150 |
6 |
|
≤ 85 kg |
0.55 |
150-Market |
8 |
|
≤ 110 kg |
0.65 |
|
|
|
> 110 kg |
1.00 |
|
|
|
1 kg = 2.2 lbs |
1 m2 = 10.76sq feet |
1lb = 0.454 kg |
1 sq foot = 0.0929m2 |
- How many pigs are sold each batch?
- With 752 sq feet unobstructed floor space
per finishing room, this provides enough room for 94 pigs a
week is be sold.
If 94 finished pigs are sold each week at 250 lbs live-weight,
which on this farm, equates to 180 lbs dead weight, a true
production target can be achieved.
The major production target for this family unit should be
to produce:
16,920 lbs of bacon each week, 52 weeks of the year, 879,840
lbs of bacon annually.
- What is the post-weaning mortality?
- This unit has over the last year
experienced a 7% post-weaning mortality.
Therefore, 94 pigs finished divided by 7% post-weaning
mortality equates to 100 pigs a week weaned.
- How many piglets are weaned per crate per
week?
- Currently the farm is producing
approximately 10 piglets weaned per sow, Table 1. However,
this is not quite the same as number weaned per crate but is
a good starting point.
Therefore 100 weaned piglets are required each weekly batch
with 10 piglets per crate, indicating 10 crates per week is
required to be filled.
- How many breeding females do I breed each
week to achieve 10 to farrow?
- This depends on the current farrowing
rate. The analysis of the 16 weeks of production indicates
an 83% farrowing rate, therefore 10 divided by 0.83
indicates the farm needs to breed a minimum of 12 breeding
females.
Table 3
Number of breeding females required to be bred to
achieve 10 per batch to farrow.
|
Current farrowing rate % |
Number to breed |
|
100 |
10 |
|
91 |
11 |
|
83 |
12 |
|
77 |
13 |
The pig flow calculator using these 8
questions
|
How do I obtain 12 breeding
females per week?
|
Figure 1
Where do the 12 breeding females come from?
 |
| To
provide 12 breeding females a week: |
- 10 may come from the farrowing house
(depending on culling policy)
- 1 or 2 from the gilt pool
- 1 is likely to come from an 18-28 day
repeat.
|
|
Sows from the farrowing house |
- This represents 10/12 (83%) of the
potential breeding females. It is imperative that as many of
these sows are re-bred. Sow culling policy may need to be
re-considered in terms of the farm's output rather than the
sow's individual attributes.
- For example a particular sow has produced 6
piglets born alive and is a parity 7 sow. On a number of farms
she is destined to be culled. So on the day of weaning she is
moved into the culling pen and is not re-bred. If this means
that the other 9 sow's cycle, together with one return and one
gilt, 11 breeding animals have been bred: - you are planning
for a 90% farrowing rate from this group.
- The sow intended for culling invariably
cycles on the Tuesday, but is not bred.
- The normal events occur and out of the 11
sows bred, 9 farrow. This has just cost the unit 10 piglets
weaned, a total potential loss of 2500 lbs live weight (about
1800 lbs dead-weight). This is a real loss because the crate
will be empty for 5 weeks assuming the farm is true to
all-in/all-out and if properly budgeted has no extra sows
anyway.
- If the sow intended for culling had been
bred and farrowed with only 6 piglets again, we have only lost
4 weaners, but at least have 6 spare teats to suckle any extra
piglets and are more likely to wean 100 piglets from the 10
crates, than if only 9 sows farrowed.
- It is a more real to consider that for
every empty farrowing crate 10 potential piglets weaned are
lost. For each empty crate add 10 to the pre-weaning mortality
and calculate your real financial pre-weaning mortality rather
than farming to keep the computer happy.
- Therefore, wherever possible breed all sows
which are weaned (common-sense must prevail). If the sow is
slightly lame breed her by AI only (a boar must never breed a
lame sow/gilt) and then place her on bedding. It is surprising
how many mildly lame sows self-cure. If you are concerned ask
for your veterinary surgeon?s advice.
- However, you must still have a culling
policy. Because the farm's aims have shifted to have 10 sows
to farrow each week, culling has only been delayed. There are
two major options:
1) Cull at the end of the breeding week: If 2 gilts cycle and thus 13 breeding
females cycle and are bred during the service week, cull any
excess sow at the end of the breeding week.
2) Cull once pregnancy has been determined
in at least 10 sows: An alternative is to delay culling until
pregnancy checking (around 28 or even 35 days). This insures
the farm until most of the returns have been detected. This
method is more accurate, but does rely on accurate pregnancy
detection. A real time scanner can take these loss days down
to 21 days and still have better accuracy than a Doppler
machine.
- Estimation of additional costs:
- Feed and housing cost $0.50 per day/sow
35 days = $17.50 (28+7 days)
- Breeding costs at about $5 per service @
2 services/sow = $10
- Total costs = $27.50 per additional sow
- Potential loss:
- If we assume an income of 46c per lbs and
10 pigs sold at 180 lbs dead weight this would equate to
$828 loss of income. However, the income from pigs
fluctuates wildly. The cost of pig production varies less.
If a cost of production of 40c per lb is assumed the farm
has not covered $720 of costs. However, a major cost
involved in producing pigs is feed at 60 %, and if these
pigs were not born the $432 of feed costs would not have
been incurred. The other costs, on the other hand, are
likely to be incurred whether these pigs exist or not and
this equated to a loss of $288 per farrowing crate empty.
This is 10x the cost of keeping an insurance breeding female
for 28 days.
- However, a sow culled at 28 days
post-breeding is likely to be in a better body condition
than she was at the point of weaning and a pregnant sow is a
better converter of feed than a non pregnant sow, so some of
your $27.50 costs will be returned as an increase in the
sow's body-weight. Also consider that on many farms sows are
rarely culled immediately after weaning, their actual exit
date will be determined by size of cull group/ market
forces/ vehicle availability, and all the time she is eating
feed.
- In practice there is a genuine welfare
benefit of keeping sows wherever possible for 28 days post
weaning to allow for any shoulder sores to heal, stiffness
of resolve and any poor body condition to be corrected. Any
old time farmer will tell you that a pregnant sow is a
better feed converter than a non-pregnant sow. Therefore,
delay culling and breed all intended to be culled sows. At
35 days post weaning (28-30 days post breeding) review the
intended to cull sows, assuming the batches pregnancy
targets have been met, then the animals intended to be
culled can be culled, if the batches pregnancy target has
not been met, a management decision has to be taken, compare
the value of the cull animal over the production loss from
an empty farrowing crate.
|
Gilt pool management |
- Several questions have to be asked
regarding gilt pool management:
- How often are gilts ordered?
- Were any calculations made to determine
this batch's actual gilt requirements?
- Is a minimum number of gilts ordered?
- Are gilt requirements discussed regularly
enough with your local breed company representative?
- Gilt pool management in the example farm
requires at least one gilt a week to cycle.
- This particular farm practices a 6 week
gilt introduction program and gilts are bred at their second
heat, 9-10 weeks post arrival.
- If gilts are ordered as a monthly order (as
is standard practice) how many gilts do I order a month?
- The number should be determined by the
requirement in 10 weeks time. This is possible to estimate
with accuracy using the breeding Csum as shown on the next
page.
- Any reduction in the number of breeding
females is represented in bold and ideally a different color.
When the remaining number of pregnant animals fall below the
target change color again to emphasize to all staff the
importance of the event. A basic form of Csum is available on
many pig computer programs, but generally do not go far
enough, i.e. do not go through lactation to the next breeding
date.
- The current week is week 27, i.e. so far no
breeding animals have been bred.
- View Breeding Csum
to assist pig flow and predict gilt purchases graph
|
|
Use of
the Csum:
- In week 1, an ideal week, one sow returned,
none of the sows have any noticeable problems at 10 - 14 weeks
of gestation (i.e. age, legs, and teats); at least one gilt is
required.
- In week 2, two sows returned and at week 10
one sow was noticed with chronic mastitis and would be
destined to be culled, if possible, at least two gilts
required.
- In week 3, while 12 sows are bred, 12 sows
are pregnant at 28 days of gestation; one sow is selected for
culling. At least one gilt is required.
- In week 4, only 10 breeding females are
bred, so even in week 1 it is known that extra gilts will be
required. Two additional sows return and only 8 breeding
females are found in-pig at 28 days. In-order to ensure that
sufficient breeding animals are presented in the required
breeding week at least 3 gilts are required to be ordered.
Note the color changes again the record a week when production
is below required.
- In week 5, while 11 sows are recorded
pregnant at 28 days, two abort in week 10. While budget
farming cannot provide sufficient leeway for all
eventualities, the effect of the abortions on the farm's
budget only need to last one production cycle. Additional
gilts are ordered to stabilize production. At least 2 gilts
are required.
- Weeks 6 onward indicate the progression of
the Csum over the weeks, clearly indicating the number of
breeding females bred, the time of their loss and sows/gilts
expected to farrow.
- Culling at 28 days post-breeding may affect
the farrowing rate and so adjustments after 28 days must be
made. On many computer programs, there is a category ?sold
for breeding? which will then recalculate the farrowing rate
based on bred expected to farrow.
- If the close attention to details described
here, is not practical, as few sows drop out after week 10 it
may be better to maintain a larger gilt pool of at least 12-14
gilts to allow for anoestrus and breeding company
availability, to safeguard your breeding target.
- If the farm suffers from seasonal
infertility/abortion problems, plan these problems into the
gilt management program. In July/August/September order and
breed extra gilts to compensate for the inevitable 10%
reduction in farrowing rate.
- Gilts need to be regulated as well. For
buying 10 gilts in one batch, and they all synchronize and
cycle in the same week is not what is required. However, this
is one of the commonest reasons for excessive numbers of
breeding females being presented to the farrowing house.
Purchase gilts in small enough groups, but watch that
- Transportation costs do not become
prohibitive. Alternatively purchase gilts of different
weights, for instance at 190 and 210 lbs to encourage a two
week spread. Some farms even purchase at three weights, 165,
190 and 210 lbs when purchasing every 6 weeks.
- As a last resort, if gilts are not
available, select you own from the finishing herd and cull
later when replacements are found.
|
Return sows |
- The re-breeding of repeat animals has to be
approached with caution, however, on many farms 10% of all
bred animals will repeat and on this farm this would equate to
approximately one sow per week. Generally it is uneconomic to
re-breed 2nd repeat breeders. Likewise animals with a 14-21
day post-service vulval discharge should be culled and not
re-bred.
- Because the farm output is determined by
the 10 farrowing crates, producing 100 weaners; sow's which
have poor weaning numbers or damaged teats are more likely to
be culled than animals for age or even sub-optimal litter size
born.
|
How many pregnant animals do
I cull at 28 days? |
- Each farm needs to review its
circumstances, for example gestation accommodation. Farms
adopting budget farming commonly used 110% farrowing crate
capacity as the number of pregnant animals to present for
farrowing. In the example farm sows should be culled back to
11 pregnant females per week. It is always possible to move 10
sows into the farrowing accommodation with 1 sow remaining in
the breeding barn. When a couple of sows have farrowed, wean
one sow; distribute her piglets to the other sucking sows.
Move the weaned sow back into the breeding barn and the
expectant sow into the vacant crate. This is acceptable
because the farrowing output requirement is 100 pigs, 10 per
crate, not 10 per sow.
|
Implications of this pig
flow farming system: |
- Better health management as overstocking
and understocking is reduced
- A farm planning to wean 100 pigs a week
will needs 300 sq feet of hot nursery a week, if pig flow is
from weaning to 66lbs, each 66 lbs pig requires 3 sq feet
and 98 pigs move out of the accommodation (2% nursery
mortality ? strictly only 294 sq feet required). As a 66 lbs
pig is reached at 10 weeks of age seven nursery rooms are
required.
- The implication of this is that if table
1 (breeding results) is a reflection of production, 4 weeks
out of the 16 the farm over-produced weaners and since
weaner accommodation is static, these weaners would be
overstocked, contra to stocking rate suggestions. Likewise 9
out of 16 weeks the weaners were under-stocked, making
ventilation management more difficult.
- The reduction in disease has been worth a
reduction in days from birth to finish of 15 to 20 days.
- The improvements associated with good pig
flow and disease management are:
- Increased pig feed intake ? as there is
less anti-nutritional stress factors
- Increased average daily gain ? as there
is less disease to fight
- Improved feed efficiency ? which is a
function of the last two improvements
- Reduced mortality in the nursery,
growing and finishing phase
- Reduces the number of run off pigs as
there is less disease challenge
- Because of higher health status there
is a reduction in the number of treatments and medication
which helps to cut the animal health and labor effort/cost
- Improved bacon quality by lowering the
risk of antibiotic residues and abscesses
- If disease occurs, management of the
problem is easier as the farm is more predictable.
- Organized farm building/plan
- With 21 day weaning and 10 sows a week to
wean, weaning once a week on a Thursday, equates to a 4 week
turn around (28 days). Therefore, 40 crates are required in
4 groups of 10. On small farms which have grown with time,
this might mean two rooms in a weeks batch, one with 6 and
another with 4 farrowing crates.
- The farm layout is demonstrated in figure
2.
- The budget farming of each area of the
farm obviously has implications if disease, poor growth and
seasonal variations occur. Some of these can be built into
the system by providing additional accommodation, but the
cost of these implications has to be assessed first.
- Maximizes output without contravening
current swine care standards
- Allows easier cost analysis
- The farm performance and costs can be
assessed, based on the farm's optimum/maximum output from
the finishing floor. Therefore, the cost of output will
determine profitability, and the cost of production can be
assessed by factors which affect output. For example:
- Increase in farrowing rate - fewer
breeding females are needed on the farm
- Increase in numbers weaned per crate -
fewer breeding females are needed on the farm
- Improvement in growth rate - reduction
in finishing space required or an increase in killing
weight
- Decrease in post-weaning mortality -
fewer breeding females are needed on the farm
- A change in producers attitudes
towards recognized targets is required
- A change in producer?s attitudes is
required, to move away from non-output targets. For instance
targets which are less important to budget farming when
compared to current farming systems:
- Monthly figures (a month is a variable
time interval and unsuitable as a batch unit of time)
- Pigs produced per breeding female per
year (gives no indication if batch sale targets are being
reached)
- Quarterly farrowing rate (fails to
allow adequate attention of reproduction management)
- Pre-weaning mortality (numbers weaned
more important)
- Herd size (the herd size should vary to
accommodate seasonal breeding requirements)
- Non-productive sow days (a good cost
implication, but only important once output target has
been achieved. Producers too concerned with NPD may miss
output targets or fail to batch adequately).
- Allows for batching and all-in/all-out
around any unit of time.
- The are farms practicing weaning every
day of the working week. On other farms they practice batch
farrowing, every 2 or 3 weeks with sows being bred, farrowed,
weaned and ultimately finished over 2 or 3 weeks to ensure
all-in/all-out by finishing air space and to increase the
size of the groups.
|
Summary |
|
Pig Flow
models
Basic pig
flow
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|