Stockpeople's Interactions
with their Pigs
The relationship between human and pigs can have significant
effects on the farm's performance and wellbeing of the pig. Handling
studies have shown that pigs are very sensitive to brief tactile
interactions from humans.
Positive behaviors of the
stockperson:
- Pats
- Hand on the back
- Talking to the pig
- Squatting to the pig?s level
|
 |
Negative behaviors of the
stockperson
- Kicks, not just forceful, but also minor kicks
- Hits with hand or baton
- Slaps
- Pushes
- Shouting
- Fast movements
|

(Note: The picture shown was staged) |
It is important to realize that negative behaviors are not only
about physical interactions, but also body posture and general
attitude.
If pigs see other pigs being positively handled they will reduce
their own fear response. Interestingly however, it a pig sees
another pig being negatively handled it does not increase its fear
response. Pigs which experience negative responses from one
stockperson will generally have fear responses to all people.
Therefore, it is important for all members of the team to have a
positive attitude.
What sort of effects have been measured?
| Measure |
Positive |
Negative |
| Growth rates |
|
Reduced by 10 to
40 g/day |
| Pregnancy rates of gilts |
88% |
33% |
| Time to interact |
10-119 seconds |
120-165 seconds |
Use of negative interactions:
At times it is necessary to use negative interactions in the day
to day husbandry of a pig farm, for instance when it is necessary to
get the animal to move out of a pen. It is also essential after
utilizing the negative action to enforce positive interactions once
the animal is up and moving. This way the long term effect of the
negative action can be nullified.
Stockperson?s behavior at breeding as an example:
 |
 |
| Good behavior: The
stockperson talks to the sow. Has good body contact and is
willing to rub and stimulate the sow |
Poor behavior: The
stockperson has no body contact with the sow. Is unwilling to
stimulate the sow, is quiet and provides no encouragement. This
can result in an increase in the time for insemination, a
reduction in farrowing rate and litter size. |
|